Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 808 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 39% better in FIFA 23 than Ryzen 3 2200G - 182 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - €73.45 vs €126.14
- Up to 19% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i5-10600KF - €0.56 vs €0.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
81%
Price, €
€126.14
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for €126.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6012 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
131
71%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6012 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |