Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8350K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8350K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 938 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 2% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-8350K - 171 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - €199.76 vs €299.16
- Up to 32% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-10600K - €1.19 vs €1.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 91 vs 95 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.75/FPS
68%
Price, €
€299.16
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for €299.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17921 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
168
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €199.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17922 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Core i3-8350K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |