Buy on Amazon
€209.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $2749
Availability
MSRP in USD: $2749
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 75 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - €209.99 vs €2846.24
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-10600 - 167 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600 - 64 vs 12 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-10600 (Basistakt: 3,30GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box
Buy for €209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77183 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€2846.24
7%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX (32C/64T, 144 MB Cache, bis zu 4,2 GHz Max Boost), One Size
Buy for €2,846.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10600
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10600
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1579
95.40785498489426%
Multi-Core
6175
42.35544276013444%
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 32 |
| 12 | Threads | 64 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
