Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than FX-8350 - 153 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - €155.88 vs €229.99
- Up to 28% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-10600 - €1.08 vs €1.5 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18851 minutes ago
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18850 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |