Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-940 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-940 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 4182 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-940.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Core i7-940 - 202 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-940 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - €49.0 vs €91.6
- Up to 44% better value when playing Control than Core i5-10400F - €0.25 vs €0.45 per FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €91.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Buy for €49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i7-940 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |