Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3574 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-760 - 122 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-760 - €90.77 vs €368.15
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 12 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €90.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74832 minutes ago
Buy for €368.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74831 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Single-Core
457
31.780250347705145%
Multi-Core
1280
22.25699878282038%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |