Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2524 days newer than Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-4670K - 188 vs 184 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670K - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €90.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1255
87.2739916550765%
Multi-Core
3544
61.624065379933924%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |