Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1703 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Core i3-6300 - 718 vs 709 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i3-6300 - €91.6 vs €125.21
- Up to 28% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i3-6300 - €0.13 vs €0.18 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
718
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€91.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €91.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Buy for €125.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |