Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 75 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - €91.6 vs €1236.45
- Up to 92% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - €0.5 vs €6.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 8% better in War Thunder than Core i5-10400F - 196 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 32 vs 12 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€91.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €91.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13627 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
196
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.31/FPS
7%
Price, €
€1236.45
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,236.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13627 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |