Buy on Amazon
€60.24
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 385 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G4900 - 174 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
155
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 3,1 GHz verwendet Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15865 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
