Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 840 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 6% better in HITMAN 3 than Celeron G3930T - 200 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
39.88355167394469%
Multi-Core
948
25.838103025347507%
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
