Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 75 days older than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 3 3200G - 131 vs 125 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
125
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |