Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100 outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100 is 676 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 1% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 216 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 44 vs 4 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-9100
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 22 |
| 4 | Threads | 44 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 145 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
