Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i3-8350K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1917 days newer than Core i3-8350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-8350K - 286 vs 241 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
286
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€404.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €404.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1474
53.99267399267399%
Multi-Core
4238
24.61234682618038%
Intel Core i3-8350K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
91 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |