Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8350K outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8350K is 180 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G4900 - 189 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Core i3-8350K - 54 vs 91 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
171
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8350K | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
91 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |