Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8350K outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8350K is 1620 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-4350 - 176 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 91 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8350K | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |