Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8300 outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8300 is 1385 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Performs up to 5% better in Rocket League than Celeron G1840 - 711 vs 675 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-8300 - 53 vs 62 Watts
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i3-8300
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8300 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2018 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 62 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
