Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Core i3-8130U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 1421 days newer than Core i3-8130U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8130U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 30% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-8130U - 659 vs 508 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8130U - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
659
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.67
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €151.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Feb 13th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8130U | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD 620 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |