Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i3-8130U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 875 days newer than Core i3-8130U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8130U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-8130U - 246 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8130U - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
246
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€579.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62716 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Feb 13th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Feb 13th, 2018
Single-Core
992
57.3742047426258%
Multi-Core
1844
18.384845463609174%
Intel Core i3-8130U | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD 620 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |