Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Core i3-8109U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7840HS is 1757 days newer than Core i3-8109U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
- Performs up to 18% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-8109U - 150 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8109U - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Apr 5th, 2018
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Apr 5th, 2018
Single-Core
1161
48.618090452261306%
Multi-Core
2396
21.411974977658623%
Intel Core i3-8109U | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS |
---|---|---|
Apr 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
28 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Iris Pro Plus | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | No |