Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8109U outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8109U is 2229 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8109U
- Performs up to 4% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than FX-6200 - 121 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 28 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8109U - 6 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-8109U
Mobile • Apr 5th, 2018
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8109U | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 5th, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 3 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Iris Pro Plus | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
