Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 602 days newer than Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 6% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-8100T - 171 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 64 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€13.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2339.63
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,339.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 273 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |