Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K and Celeron G3930 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 6% better in Valheim than Celeron G3930 - 202 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-7350K - 51 vs 60 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
41.8732782369146%
Multi-Core
1043
36.30351548903585%
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 60 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
