Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 1910 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 7% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-6100 - 136 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 60 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 6 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
