Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 2192 days newer than Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 9% better in Valheim than Core i3-7300 - 216 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76876 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1260
55.3116769095698%
Multi-Core
2502
32.32140550316497%
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |