Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 2282 days newer than Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 41% better in F1 23 than Core i7-950 - 209 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 51 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i7-950
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-950
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Single-Core
463
36.687797147385105%
Multi-Core
1569
61.79598267034265%
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | Intel Core i7-950 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2009 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Bloomfield |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
