Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 1546 days newer than Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 51 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 4% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i3-6300 - 499 vs 482 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 48 vs 4 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1262
75.70485902819436%
Multi-Core
2539
19.065855673199668%
Intel Core i3-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Skylake | Codename | Castle Peak |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 4 | Threads | 48 |
| 3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 38.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
