Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 2968 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-14600KF - €68.52 vs €298.24
- Up to 74% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-14600KF - €0.39 vs €1.5 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Deathloop than Core i3-6100 - 199 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 20 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
175
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €68.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
199
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.5/FPS
26%
Price, €
€298.24
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €298.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-14600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |