Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Core i3-560 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 3532 days newer than Core i3-560.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 73 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-560 - 125 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-560 - 20 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-560
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Core i9-10900K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-560
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Single-Core
443
25.328759291023438%
Multi-Core
932
10.171341263778238%
Intel Core i3-560 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
