Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 2727 days newer than Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 73 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 15% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-540 - 131 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 20 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €522.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76059 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarkdale | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |