Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G1820 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G1820 is 1424 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 3% better in War Thunder than Core i3-540 - 132 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i3-540 - €35.49 vs €200.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i3-540 - €0.27 vs €1.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i3-540 - 53 vs 73 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for €200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 239 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 239 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Clarkdale | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
73 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |