Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 1061 days newer than Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 0% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i3-540 - 223 vs 222 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Core i3-540 - 55 vs 73 Watts
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-540
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 73 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
