Buy on Amazon
€200
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $133
Availability
MSRP in USD: $133
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $149
Availability
MSRP in USD: $149
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the more expensive Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 3468 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-540.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-540 - 229 vs 206 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i3-540 - €101.54 vs €200.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i3-540 - €0.44 vs €0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-540 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Sockel 1156 Core i3 Processor i3-540 Box Prozessor (3060MHz, L2/L3-Cache)
Buy for €200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19397 minutes ago
Ryzen 5 3400G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
229
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€101.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G 4,2GHz AM4 6MB Cache Wraith Spire
Buy for €101.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19398 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-540
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Ryzen 5 3400G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-540 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 73 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
