Key Differences
In short — Core i3-5005U outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-5005U is 859 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-5005U
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8320 - 118 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-5005U - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-5005U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-5005U | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Broadwell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 5500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
