Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2430 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4370.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €55.85 vs €173.72
- Up to 68% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-11600KF - €0.29 vs €0.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i3-4370 - 192 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
190
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.85
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
32%
Price, €
€173.72
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €173.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |