Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4370 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4370 is 897 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G3930T - 172 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4370 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-4370
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
44.91803278688525%
Multi-Core
948
39.38512671375155%
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 54 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
