Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4350 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4350 is 514 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4350
- Performs up to 5% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G1610 - 197 vs 188 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 54 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4350
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4350 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
