Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Core i3-4330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2060 days newer than Core i3-4330.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4330
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-4330 - 178 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4330 - 8 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4330
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-9700F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4330
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
1066
68.81859264041317%
Multi-Core
2144
34.271099744245525%
Intel Core i3-4330 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
