Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms Core i3-4330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1220 days newer than Core i3-4330.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4330 - 126 vs 125 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4330 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-4330
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i3-7100T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4330 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 54 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
