Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 376 days newer than Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 54 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-4160 - 241 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
241
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€129.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €129.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
71.89189189189189%
Multi-Core
2072
42.3116193587911%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 91 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |