Buy on Amazon
Out of Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $449
Availability
MSRP in USD: $449
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X3D is 2830 days newer than Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
- Performs up to 10% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-4160 - 129 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D Processor (8 cores/16 threads, AM4 Socket, 105W DTP, 100 MB Cache, up to 4.5 GHz max boost, no cooler)
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 1690 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
50.884744141559054%
Multi-Core
2072
18.91201168309602%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Vermeer |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.