Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800 outperforms Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800 is 2367 days newer than Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-4160 - 251 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 16 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €254 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |