Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 978 days older than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 24% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G3930 - 98 vs 79 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4150 - 51 vs 54 Watts
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
58.40537944284342%
Multi-Core
1043
50.95261358085003%
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 54 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
