Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 488 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 7% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G3900 - 244 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i3-4150 - €51.75 vs €78.99
- Up to 28% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i3-4150 - €0.23 vs €0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4150 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €78.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
227
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |