Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 555 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 20% better in Starfield than FX-4300 - 53 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i3-4150 - €29.22 vs €78.99
- Up to 56% better value when playing Starfield than Core i3-4150 - €0.66 vs €1.49 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €78.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Buy for €29.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |