Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 2276 days newer than Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 54 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 16% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-4130 - 587 vs 508 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 64 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
587
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€2339.63
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,339.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
995
60.81907090464548%
Multi-Core
1960
13.992004568817817%
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |