Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4005U outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4005U is 275 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4005U
- Performs up to 2% better in Rust than Celeron G1610 - 156 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 15 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4005U | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |