Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7640X outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7640X is 2360 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i5-7640X - 35 vs 112 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-7640X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7640X
- Performs up to 61% better in War Thunder than Core i3-390M - 201 vs 125 FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | Intel Core i5-7640X |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 112 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |