Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 2186 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-390M - 128 vs 126 FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-390M
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Arrandale | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 35 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
