Key Differences
In short — FX-4100 outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4100 is 276 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Performs up to 0% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-390M - 213 vs 212 FPS
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
213
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €20.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 306 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Arrandale | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |